🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage may be the perfect choice for a daring horror film about Jesus Christ, but not for the causes some audiences may think. In reality, Cage doesn't even act as Jesus in the new film: the part he plays is listed simply as a craftsman. He is framed as a father figure in this tale, attempting to maintain his religious convictions as his son (acted by the young actor), his now-teenage adopted son, commences to display supernatural abilities. Why it’s difficult to picture a different prominent performer taking this character is that while the figure is weighed down with numerous trials, Nicolas Cage seems almost touchingly convinced that the murky, somber small film is worth his time.

The Actor's Recent Career Choices

Nicolas Cage was using that time more carefully recently. He still does more movies than most average viewers will ever see — as an illustration, are you aware that he has filmed three distinct Westerns over the last few years? — however he also adds esteemed independent films for example Dream Scenario, Pig, and Longlegs. This new film seems like a similar project, as it’s genre-adjacent, likely to stir debate, and approaches a over-the-top description with gravity.

The Film's Storyline and Handling

Sadly, writer-director the director does not justify viewer engagement. The Carpenter’s Son starts from a engagingly rootless place, presented as drawing from an unknown scripture regarding the youthful days of the messiah. The Carpenter, The Mother, and their child relocate from place to place, afraid of faith-based hostility or doubt over their son's strange powers. “Disaster trails us,” The Carpenter gloomily remarks. This persists as sinister entities target them where they currently live, getting a jump-start on the traditional religious challenge for The Boy.

At times, the movie echoes an Exorcist-style supernatural thriller, except that none of the lead characters are clearly inhabited. Instead, they become more and more distant from one another, as these forces influence a nearby girl (Isla Johnston, credited as an outsider) who The Boy forms a relationship with, and gives all unsettling premonitions of a grim future. Cage's role in particular fights with his place within the plot, at times scolding his child who mystifies him.

Controversy and Sensitivity

This material is likely to invite debate, and Nathan approaches it with plenty of sensitivity — overly, possibly. The notion of a adolescent facing his eventual sacrifice and lured by dark influences is certainly terrifying, but Nathan could be wary of appearing sensational and keen to indicate his goals, so he often falls back on dimly foreboding cinematography. The roles continually reflect — FKA Twigs, who showed real promise in another movie, interestingly — surrenders her performance to her Mother Mary cloak, sometimes broken up by a few disturbing frightening scenes.

Cage's Acting and Movie's Flaws

Meanwhile, Cage dabbles in precisely the type of overacting that his ironic fans might be looking for. There is a moment (also included) in promotional material in which Cage erupts and yells “My belief is broken!” When this sort of theatrical release is included in your Jesus-themed horror movie, perhaps a more brazenly silly method would take better advantage of the actor's readiness to exaggerate when necessary. Rather, the film more closely resembles the poorer direct-to-video productions Cage made over the last decade — excluding the campy action films but rather the narrative films and supernatural thrillers that always sound promising, and frequently include several notable Cage moments, but finally come across like, frankly, cheap home video fare.

Truthfully, a number of those, although simpler, were more entertaining as a whole. This is when I must violate my personal rule, not faith-based but career-related: Years back, a beloved editor convinced me to eliminate adjectives like “monotonous” or “lifeless” from my reviewing language. Such terms express scant except a personal and vaguely expressed impatience, disengaging from the job of vibrantly communicating the intellectual and feeling of watching a particular movie. It’s difficult to communicate monotony without seeming uninteresting personally. It’s no more expressive as labeling a movie “engaging.” “Elaborate,” essentially.

But I must confess, I was bored throughout The Carpenter’s Son. To the movie’s non-exploitative credit, it is a devotional type of dullness, not due to The Carpenter’s Son is moralizing, but as it demands a type of obedient endurance to sit through it. After a while soon after starting, this feature settles into a monotonous pattern of simmering anguish, and fails to